Monday, September 28, 2020

Why Do So Many Black Americans Support White Racist Controlled Democratic Party?

Don't they know that Dr. Martin Luther King’s niece, Dr. Alveda King, accuses Democratic Party supported Planned Parenthood of what Rev. Dr. Clenard H Childress Jr. calls "Black Genocide"? 

King points out  “The leading cause of death in the African-American community is not gang-violence, gun violence, heart attack, stroke, HIV, high blood pressure, diabetes. People will name all these. No, it’s abortion. And the reason we have come to that conclusion, statistically, you’ve got 60 million plus abortions legal in America since 1973. About a third of those occur in the African-American community. That means dead babies. And, with us being 13 percent or less of America’s population that means we are having more abortions'."

  King says the number of abortions don't mean that African-Americans are more immoral or don’t care."  Instead  she states:  "We are just regular, everyday people like everyone else. But Planned Parenthood moved into our community with the abortion killing centers and said, ‘We’re here to help you. Let’s kill your baby, so you can have a better life.’ Well, killing our babies doesn’t give us a better life. I have had my own abortions in the 1970s. They were secret then, and after I became born again in 1983 and became a pro-life voice, I began to talk about how those abortions hurt me and my family.”

The claim that racists have regained control of the Democratic Party may come as a  surprise to those who don't know that the Democratic Party is the historic home of racism.  The   Democratic Party is the party of slavery, secession and  segregation.  

The people who complain about the monument to slave owner Thomas Jefferson in Washington ignore the fact that he and other slave owners established the Democratic Party.   People protest southern Civil War monuments and ignore the fact the Democratic Party is itself  a monument because Confederate leaders  were Democrats as were the founders of the  post war Ku Klux Klan [KKK]..  Late in the 19th Century the Democratic Party established rigid "Jim Crow" racial  segregation laws in southern states.  . 

   
Day Gardner notes that  during the 20's "the KKK raged a lynching war on blacks in the south while Margaret Sanger and friends devised an evil plan of their own. Sanger was a staunch believer in eugenics, “race hygiene.” Her book, The Pivot of Civilization, {1922} contained her solution to the negro problem. She touted sterilization of 'genetically inferior races' which she called 'human weeds'.Since blacks were known to be blessed with large families, Sanger’s plan had to include limiting the growth of the black population by eliminating our children."

After World War II the Democratic Party split on the racial issue.  President Harry Truman integrated the armed forces in spite of opposition from within the Democratic Party.  Presidents John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson continued Truman's effort to end racial discrimination with Johnson managing to get landmark civil rights legislation  through Congress.  Southern Democratic Party senators provided the primary opposition to Johnson's legislation.  

The battle  for civil rights legislation was  between north and south rather than   between Republicans  and Democrats.  President Johnson used a bipartisan  coalition of  northern  Republicans  and Democrats to defeat southern opponents in the  Senate.


Prior to the passage of Johnson's legislation Democrat governors tried to block court ordered integration at Little Rock Ark. high school and the University of Alabama. President Dwight D. Eisenhower [a Republican] used Army troops to  enforce federal court orders which integrated school at Little Rock Ark.  Some local southern Democrats tried to suppress civil rights demonstrators.

After the sixties, racism in the Democratic Party seemed to be relatively benign.  Democrats have continued  to perpetuate the old southern myth that black Americans  and white Americans belong to  different races in spite of the fact that African, European, and North American DNA have been mixing together for 400 years.   

At some point racist Democrats obviously decided to partner with the Planned Parenthood organization founded by racist Margaret Sanger    to pursue what appears to be their "final solution" to the racial issue.   They would try to discourage black women from having babies to keep the black population from growing.

Dr. King says, “Margaret Sanger, the founder of the Birth Control League [later, Planned Parenthood], said, that ‘colored people are like weeds,’ and they need to be eliminated. They need to be exterminated. We don’t want the word to get out, so let’s not package it that way. So that’s why they began to make a lot of propaganda and marketing materials, saying that abortion is a woman’s right. It will help her to finish college, get a job, do this or do that.”

Day Gardner notes, "in New York City, the abortion rate in the black community is at 60%, which means more black babies are aborted than are born.The KKK brutally killed about 3,500 black people since it began in 1865, Sanger’s Planned Parenthood is responsible for 19 million black deaths since 1973."

As part of the  effort to maintain the appearance of racial conflict, Democrats encouraged blacks to fear white racism while trying to keep blacks from recognizing that the real threat was to their babies.

Southern blacks should  stop wasting time with ghosts from the past associated with Civil War monuments.  The real racist threat is the threat to beautiful black babies from the unholy alliance of racist Democrats and Planned Parenthood abortionists.

 

Friday, September 25, 2020

Global Warming Theory Disproved a Century Ago

 The global warming priests have presented no evidence that the process they claim causes "global warming" exists.   They just illogically claim that any increase in what they call the "global average temperature"  can only result from carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.   
     
Paul  Homewood has   reported on questionable manipulation of temperature data used to calculate this global average temperature.   Anthony Watts has documented problems with temperature data for several years on his blog.   

The controversy over the accuracy of the data can be viewed as much ado about nothing because the so-called global average temperature  "is thermodynamically as well as mathematically an impossibility, says Bjarne Andresen, a professor at The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, who has analyzed this topic in collaboration with professors Christopher Essex from University of Western Ontario and Ross McKitrick from University of Guelph, Canada." 

"It is impossible to talk about a single temperature for something as complicated as the climate of Earth", Bjarne Andresen says,  an expert of thermodynamics. "A temperature can be defined only for a homogeneous system. Furthermore, the climate is not governed by a single temperature. Rather, differences of temperatures drive the processes and create the storms, sea currents, thunder, etc. which make up the climate".

"While it is possible to treat temperature statistically locally, it is meaningless to talk about a a global temperature for Earth. The Globe consists of a huge number of components which one cannot just add up and average."

Even if the concept of a global average temperature was meaningful, the method of determining it is too primitive to produce a valid average.  Instead of using hourly temperatures, they just use the high and low temperature which may not be representative of temperatures during the day.   For example, the arrival of a strong  cold front late in the day can make the low temperature significantly lower than temperatures during the rest of the day.  

Even social scientists have moved away from using broad averages because such averages cover up too much information.   For example, social scientists look at the number of people in various age groups instead of the average age.   The number of homes with children or with one adult or two adults is used rather than the average household size which always ends up with a fraction of a person.   In the last presidential election people talked about the 3% in one income group and the percentage that didn't pay any income tax instead of the per capita income. 

 A third problem with the climate shaman's obsession with temperatures is that although a temperature decrease would disprove the claim of global warming, a temperature increase would not prove that CO2 was responsible.   The global warming preachers routinely commit the logical fallacy   "post hoc ergo proper hoc".    I learned that basic logic concept in high school English class. The global warming fanatics either didn't learn about the fallacy or don't understand that the fact that A follows B doesn't necessarily mean A causes B.

With their simple minded view of the situation they blithely assume that any temperature increase could only be a result of an increase in CO2.   They seemingly cannot understand that they must provide evidence that an increase in CO2 would cause any temperature increase.  They ignore the fact that other factors are known to be able to increase air temperature.

The teracalories of heat human activity generates each day would be the most likely cause of any temperature increase that wasn't caused by an increase in the sun's output.    Each teracalorie is capable of  raising the temperature of a trillion grams of water by 1 Celsius.   A teracalorie would raise the temperature of about 4-5 trillion grams of dry air 1 C.

Except in desert and tropical areas, most of the time the human body has a higher temperature than the air.   Automobile engines and other human technology generate sufficient heat to boil water.   Many types of air conditioning systems remove heat from the interior of buildings and transfer it outside where it heats the outside air.   Some of the heat used to warm the interiors of buildings in cold weather leaks out and heats the outside air.

Thursday, September 3, 2020

Democrats & Planned Parenthood Push African Child Sacrifice Religion in America

  It seems strange to talk about child sacrifice in 2020,  but it continues  to be part of  "traditional African medicine".

According to Wikipedia:  "Witch doctors, who also identify as traditional healers, will consult the spirits for anyone who can pay their fee.[6] The spirits will communicate via them the kind of sacrifice for appeasement that they want. Often  these sacrifices are chickens or goats, but when such sacrifices fail to make the client prosper instantly, 'the spirits' will demand human sacrifices.[8]"

  Witch doctors may   suggest child sacrifice to help with  matter  involving "health or good fortune" or perhaps " to ward off evil spirits"    Child sacrifice "is the harmful practice  of removing body parts, blood or tissue from a child who is still alive.[4] "

[ note:  Witch doctors played  a role in English culture. "In its original meaning witch doctors were not witches themselves, but rather people who had remedies to protect others against witchcraft. Witchcraft-induced conditions were their area of expertise"]

Evangelist Dr. Alveda King, the niece of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.  said:    "   Planned Parenthood moved into our community with the abortion killing centers and said, ‘We’re here to help you. Let’s kill your baby, so you can have a better life.’ Well, killing our babies doesn’t give us a better life."

Dismemberment abortion  fits the definition of child sacrifice  because "abortionists tear off the baby’s limbs and crush the head while the child is alive. "

Americans may not understand that people in less knowledgeable societies may attribute mental issues such as depression  to  "evil spirits."    Planned Parenthood's  [witch] doctors may prescribe abortion/child sacrifice to treat depression