I've been trying to find a logical reason for the Congressional vote
    for the extreme action of imposing sanctions on Russia.
    
    Sanction supporters talk about what they call "fake news",but the
    term is just another word for propaganda which governments produce
    all  the time.  We didn't impose sanctions on the British
    government for its "fake news" stories about Weapons of Mass
    Destruction in Iraq.
    
    Russian spying on candidates cannot justify sanctions because spying
    on political figures is  a common  government
    activity.  Besides the CIA had already infiltrated the Russian
    hackers who were the alleged spies. 
    
    The only significant difference in the situation is that the person
    Congress is concerned about is a woman, Hillary Clinton.  
    I believe Congress  is upset because  members think the
    big old Russian bear was mean to poor little defenseless Goldilocks.
    
    Does anyone believe Congress would have taken a similar action if
    Donald Trump had been the alleged victim?  Or, for that matter
    the previous losing Democratic candidate John Kerry?
    
    Congress didn't impose sanctions when Vietnam meddled in the 2004
    election by producing  story claiming that potential Democratic
    presidential aspirant Sen Bob Kerrey had participated in a war crime
    in Vietnam 50 years earlier.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 

No comments:
Post a Comment